|
| |
TRAINING PROGRAMME
CONTRACTING
FOR BETTER PUBLIC TRANSPORT
AMSTERDAM, 23-24 MARCH 2009 |
PROGRAMME
| |
|
|
Arrival of participants in Amsterdam. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Evening: Welcome reception at Albus Grand Hotel |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Course coordinator: Didier van de Velde |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Official Opening |
| |
Programme introduction and ice-breaking activity
Sarah Foulon, Training Programme Manager, UITP
|
| |
|
|
Session 1 Presenting the options |
| |
Didier van de Velde, inno-V, The Netherlands
Public transport actors: types of authorities, their role and competences
Options for the allocation of decision-making in public transport between various actors: Strategic –Tactical – Operational levels
Potential roles for competition, concepts of competitive tendering in public transport
Type of contracts, levels of risk and sharing of risks and responsibilities between operator and authority
Overview of organizational forms in local public transport: direct award, route tendering, network tendering, deregulation
Regulatory and institutional framework (The European legislation)
(including coffee break at 11:00 until 11:30)
After this introduction: four sessions to present and discuss intensively each of the four main cases
This afternoon: The base case and the modernised traditional case (direct award) versus the radical change (deregulation)
|
| |
|
|
Lunch break |
| |
Including visit of De Bazel (30')
|
| |
|
|
Session 2 Direct awarding |
| |
Didier van de Velde, inno-V, The Netherlands
Presentation of the essentials of the case, including the transition path (course leader), illustration of different implementation possibilities (course leader and case speakers) (40’)
Lessons learned (case speakers) and Issues for further improvement (course leader and case speakers) (20’)
Mini-workshops in sub-groups to discuss specifics of the case (30’)
Christoph Schaaffkamp, KCW, Berlin, Germany
|
| |
|
|
Coffee break |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Session 3 Deregulation |
| |
Didier van de Velde, inno-V, The Netherlands
Presentation of the essentials of the case, including the transition path (course leader), illustration of different implementation possibilities (course leader and case speakers) (40’)
Lessons learned (case speakers) and Issues for further improvement (course leader and case speakers) (20’)
Mini-workshops in sub-groups to discuss specifics of the case (30’)
British regional city
|
| |
|
|
Plenary discussion |
| |
|
| |
|
|
End of the session |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Dinner |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Today: The main alternatives in competitive tendering: Route tendering versus network tendering: options, lessons learned and challenges |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Session 4 The route tendering model |
| |
Didier van de Velde, inno-V, The Netherlands
Presentation of the essentials of the case, including the transition path (course leader), illustration of different implementation possibilities (course leader and case speakers) (40’)
Lessons learned (case speakers) and Issues for further improvement (course leader and case speakers) (20’)
Coffee break (30’)
Mini-workshops in sub-groups to discuss specifics of the case (30’)
Simon Thomas, Transport for London, UK
|
| |
|
|
Coffee break |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Focus topic: The new Public Service Obligations (PSO) |
| |
Thomas Avanzata, Avanzata Conseil, Belgium
|
| |
|
|
Lunch break |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Session 5 The network tendering model |
| |
Didier van de Velde, inno-V, The Netherlands
Presentation of the essentials of the case, including the transition path (course leader), illustration of different implementation possibilities (course leader and case speakers) (40’)
Lessons learned (case speakers) and Issues for further improvement (course leader and case speakers) (20’)
Coffee break (30’)
Mini-workshops in sub-groups to discuss specifics of the case (30’)
Bas Bakker, Stadsregio Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
| |
|
|
Coffee break |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Plenary discussion |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Conclusions & Evaluation of the training |
| |
|
| |
|
|
End of the programme |
| |
|
|
