Hero picture
Photo by Shanmugamp7
Report
publication

CBTC maintenance benchmark

  • Global
  • North America
  • automation
  • Best practice
  • Maintenance
  • Operators
Maintenance of automated metros

How to organise an upgrade to metro lines

How do metro operators organise their maintenance activities? That’s a key question when migrating from legacy systems to new Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) technology.

Société de transport de Montréal (STM) led a study to help guide their own transition. Montréal‘s metro network consists of four lines, all equipped with the same legacy signalling system. STM started a project to migrate one of the lines to CBTC, involving the replacement of interlockings, ATC and ATS. But when preparing for this, STM wanted clarification on how to maintain a CBTC system and about the best share of work between the supplier and the authority.

The purpose of this study is to better understand how other metro operators organise their maintenance activities, and if the migration from legacy systems to CBTC (and more widely to computer-based systems) involves a shift in the share of work.

Contents:

  • Introduction
    • Purpose of the study
    • Methodology
    • Abbreviations
    • Survey contributors
    • Glossary
  • Questionnaire results
    • Nature of signalling systems
    • Share of work in maintenance
      • Legacy systems
      • Computerised systems
    • Share of work in maintenance
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations
  • Appendix

Survey contributors

Montréal, Canada
Mumbai, India
Helsinki, Finland
Milan, Italy
Vancouver, Canada
São Paulo, Brazil
Frankfurt, Germany
Madrid, Spain
Paris, France
Lausanne, Switzerland
Lisboa, Portugal
Porto, Portugal
Brussels, Belgium
Hamburg, Germany
Toronto, Canada
Stockholm, Sweden
London, United Kingdom
Access
exclusive resources